It'd been long since when I was thinking to write particularly about feminism. Having said that let me give a bit about my family background. Parents and one younger brother. That's it. No sister :(
But of course, many cousin sisters. But cousin sister cannot be substitute of own sister, in general.
It all began with a difference. The displacement of few ounce of flesh across the naval. They should be treated differently not unequally. Men are physically stronger than women. That became the crucial factor in creating a man dominant society. All the laws were made by men. Therefore, they executed well for men. And women had no apparent benefit from them. So they remained dormant. But now in the post-globalization era women power is rising. That is economical aspect. Historically, men has performed well in all the field like science, philosophy, politics, rulership, spirituality.. Women doesn't stand anywhere. In science Einstein rules, in philosophy Socrates rules, in leadership Gandhi rules, in rulership Alexander rules and in spirituality Jesus/Buddha/Krishna rules. There is no female scientist at par comparable with Einstein. I know some people don't like to compare. But beware, compare is the basis of your qualification. No, I am not criticizing feminism. I am just saying what I have observed. I might be talking totally nonsense. There are only two possibility for this. Either they cant do big creation or they don't want to do big creation. I think latter is true. They don't want to do big creation. They don't want to make better painting then Michael Angelo. Can they make better paintings than Michael Angelo. Yes they can. But they don't want to. Sometimes, it happens. You can do a thing but you don't want to do that for some reason. And the reason I found is, women's greatest creation is the ability to give birth which no male can do. Creating something live is most difficult thing. Which even thousands of Michael Angelo cannot do that. No matter how good his painting is. But the painting is dead. There is not life in those paintings. But woman's creation has life in it. Which has power to give birth to Michael Angelo. Therefore, woman are definitely the greatest creator. And I think that's the reason they don't want to create any thing non-living. So, women's biggest asset is to become a mother. A women is considered to be incomplete unless she become a mother. But the modern girls don't want to be mother so soon. They are more career oriented. In today's world career has become most important. Earlier people do not used to worry more about career. They were happy.
Nature doesn't give everything in free. If nature make man more powerful, then females are in general more resistive. They have strong survival instinct. Given an identical situation females will survive comparatively longer. That's the reason 4-5 years age gap are kept at the time of marriage. Husbands are older.
In India, women have been particularly more unfortunate. After Gargi's incident they had been deprived from main streamline of knowledge - Vedas. That made their condition even more worse. They became as a congregator of man's earning and remained mostly as men's physical commodity. They had no strong power in the family affairs. But the situation has improved a bit now.
Feel free to agree/disagree... :)
But of course, many cousin sisters. But cousin sister cannot be substitute of own sister, in general.
It all began with a difference. The displacement of few ounce of flesh across the naval. They should be treated differently not unequally. Men are physically stronger than women. That became the crucial factor in creating a man dominant society. All the laws were made by men. Therefore, they executed well for men. And women had no apparent benefit from them. So they remained dormant. But now in the post-globalization era women power is rising. That is economical aspect. Historically, men has performed well in all the field like science, philosophy, politics, rulership, spirituality.. Women doesn't stand anywhere. In science Einstein rules, in philosophy Socrates rules, in leadership Gandhi rules, in rulership Alexander rules and in spirituality Jesus/Buddha/Krishna rules. There is no female scientist at par comparable with Einstein. I know some people don't like to compare. But beware, compare is the basis of your qualification. No, I am not criticizing feminism. I am just saying what I have observed. I might be talking totally nonsense. There are only two possibility for this. Either they cant do big creation or they don't want to do big creation. I think latter is true. They don't want to do big creation. They don't want to make better painting then Michael Angelo. Can they make better paintings than Michael Angelo. Yes they can. But they don't want to. Sometimes, it happens. You can do a thing but you don't want to do that for some reason. And the reason I found is, women's greatest creation is the ability to give birth which no male can do. Creating something live is most difficult thing. Which even thousands of Michael Angelo cannot do that. No matter how good his painting is. But the painting is dead. There is not life in those paintings. But woman's creation has life in it. Which has power to give birth to Michael Angelo. Therefore, woman are definitely the greatest creator. And I think that's the reason they don't want to create any thing non-living. So, women's biggest asset is to become a mother. A women is considered to be incomplete unless she become a mother. But the modern girls don't want to be mother so soon. They are more career oriented. In today's world career has become most important. Earlier people do not used to worry more about career. They were happy.
Nature doesn't give everything in free. If nature make man more powerful, then females are in general more resistive. They have strong survival instinct. Given an identical situation females will survive comparatively longer. That's the reason 4-5 years age gap are kept at the time of marriage. Husbands are older.
In India, women have been particularly more unfortunate. After Gargi's incident they had been deprived from main streamline of knowledge - Vedas. That made their condition even more worse. They became as a congregator of man's earning and remained mostly as men's physical commodity. They had no strong power in the family affairs. But the situation has improved a bit now.
Feel free to agree/disagree... :)
