Showing posts with label Feminism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Feminism. Show all posts

Thursday, June 5, 2008

The Girl - part 4

Existence has three layers - 1. Physical Layer, 2. Mental layer, 3. Spiritual layer. At mental layer there are not much difference between males and females. At spiritual layer there is absolutely no difference. But, at physical layer there are magnanimous differences. At the subtler layers difference will be less. Grosser layer will have more difference. Initially, at the beginning of the civilization society was primarily physical layers based. At that time demand of physical strength was more for survival. Physically stronger people used to rule and survive better. That's natural also. If females were physically more stronger they would had ruled males. That's why it was easy for males to dominate the society for the simple reason they were physically stronger.
Now society has moved to mental layer. Now society wants mind, not the physical strength. As I said - at the mental layer there are not much difference between males and females. That's the reason status of females in the society is rising. Because at mental layer they are equal to males. Because, now society needs brain and mind. Whenever society will be centered at subtler layers status of women in the society will rise. And whenever society will be centred at carnal layer that will be deleterious for females.

Sunday, June 1, 2008

The Girl - Part 3

What is real feminism? Is it what you read in Femina? Is it what to achieve academic success and professional success. No. Working in an MNC on onsite is not success. That's survival. The need for survival. Day by day survival. The real feminism is the motherhood. Feminism means motherhood. Feminsm doesn't mean to show off your figure in the shopping malls. Western civilization, MTV, these magazines on feminism has destroyed Indian Culture. The normal city girls read these magazine these tv and learn culture from them. I was talking to a gal, I asked her what's your hobbey? She said "meeting guys". Thank god she didn't say "mating guys". But in near future they might say. If they can say meet then they can say mate also. Be it however by a stupid mistake. But they can say. And a time will come when they gonna say. The distance between meet and mate is not much. Even Manhatten distance is not much. Lol. It was a shock for me. Infact a news for me. I was on Pluto after hearing this. This was not happening few years back. It's happening now. It started suddenly. Globalization ruined our culture on the cost of technical development. Such hobbies are kept by actress of Hollywood. Basically, bollywood actress learns from Hollywood actress. And city girls learn from bollywood actress (in Hindi movies). So, knowledge in transferred from Hollywood actress to bollywood actress to city girls to village girls. From hollywood to a village. That's a big chain of knowledge transfer. That's one result of Information Technology. Information is everywhere. Few days back a highly educated gal used a F words on her blog (That post is deleted now). That was another news. Indian is definitely progressing. F words are used in USA most. And they are the most developed country. So basically, F words are the sign of development. That girl is highly successful both academically and professionally and she used F words. That's the progress she has made. A big applaud to her.
I had said earlier - Everything has a cost associated with it. There is nothing free in This universe. Only existence is free. Except existence everything has a cost associated with it. You cant simply just improve at zero operating cost. You have to pay a cost to improve. Those who are not progressing they don't pay the cost of improvement. They are fine. That's how it get balanced. You can improve, you can do wonder but, at the cost of something. Let me put an example. Say there is a woman A who is CEO of a big billion $ MNC. There is another woman B who is a simple housewife who doesn't have much hunch in her life. Woman A is always busy with office work and meetings and travelling. But she has a maid to take care of her kids. Woman B simply stays at home and she has ample time to spend her time with her kids. Because she doesn't work. Now which woman is more successful? A or B? To my view B is successful. Woman B is 10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000times more successful than A. Because, she is doing real feminism - The motherhood.

Tuesday, January 1, 2008

The Girl - Part 2

How to define a girl? What is a girl? A girl is nothing but full of compassion. Girl's biggest ornament is her shyness. If a girl is not a shy she is not a girl. She is something else. Every female is not a girl. The modern girls do not shy. The reason is they try to act like boys. They wear like boys, they speak like boys, they think like boys and the behave like boys. There is not harm in that. But they lose female personality being a female. Neither they can't achieve total 100% male personality. So their personality is mixture of male and female personality. Girls in villages are still maintaining their female personality. Far better than city girls. City girls are mixture of male and female personality. That's why they don't land anywhere. This is due to ongoing rat-race to raise their social status. Which is perfectly okay keeping a note that they had been treated unequally.
In India, where we worship goddess Durga as the goddess of power, there females are treated so unequally. What a hypocritical civilization. I don't need to give examples to make this post more interesting. Anyway just to add it, why did Ram question Sita's character when both Ram and Sita were separated from each other? If Sita can be questioned then Ram can be also questioned in a similar manner. No, it's not my bias towards Sita because Sita was a maithil girl. This was not expected from Maryada Purushottam Ram. That's the typical example of male dominant society. Ram may not be Maryada Purushottam but Sita was definitely Nariottam. Nariottam means the best among females. Infact, I do not like the character of Ram. Ram is bounded by Maryada. He is not free. He has to meet social expectation. That's why Ramavtar is not considered as a complete avtar. Krishnavtar is called purna avtar. In him Brahman descended in it's totality. That's why you will find krishna is not much worried of social obligations. He will steal curd, butter. He will break promises. He will run-away from battlefield. He will marry almost 16000 girls. He will steal bathing girl's clothes. Many things. But, Ram cannot behave like that. He is bounded of Maryada.
Girls most favourite word is "No". Sometimes big a "Nooooooo...". They need to stop being dependent. There do exist fundamental problems with them. At least boys can go to forest and meditate. So far, no female ever went to Himalayas to meditate. They can't go. They think many things are happening. Although nothing is happening. They are brought-up with the mindset that "all boys are bad, don't talk to them". Boys are brought up with mindset that "Follow brahmcharya, do not even look at the girl until you marry". This happens in India. And this prevents love to sprout between them. The so called bf-gf you see in the shopping malls is just slightly more than the carnal attraction. Love is dormant there. Unless humanity learn how to love each other we would never have peace. Like so far we have not witnessed peace. At least I did not. Either we fight, or we do preparation for the next fight.
Those sages who incorporated Brahmcharya in vedic society could not imagine what's gonna happen in 20th century. I do believe the real meaning of brahmcharya is totally contaminated. Brahmcharya literally means whose action is like Brahm. It has nothing to do with a girl. However it does boils down to that to some extent. But not fundamentally. Fundamentally, one who is firmly established in brahman is the real brahmchari. And that he can do irrespective of how many gf's he has. Krishna is one example.
Our education should not impart us mathematical forum ale, equations rather should prepare us to cultivate the love.
Great love cannot happen in the same gender. You would never find two great female friends. Impossible. They can be good friend. A very good friend. But not a great friend. It has to has to in the opposite gender. The advantage they have is they are so close to divine. Their curiosity is like a child. Look at Gargi. Only a child can ask such question to Yagyawalak. The behaviour wise there is not much difference between girls and children. Both are delicate. Both are innocent. So, they should be protected.

Tuesday, December 25, 2007

The Girl - Part 1

It'd been long since when I was thinking to write particularly about feminism. Having said that let me give a bit about my family background. Parents and one younger brother. That's it. No sister :(
But of course, many cousin sisters. But cousin sister cannot be substitute of own sister, in general.

It all began with a difference. The displacement of few ounce of flesh across the naval. They should be treated differently not unequally. Men are physically stronger than women. That became the crucial factor in creating a man dominant society. All the laws were made by men. Therefore, they executed well for men. And women had no apparent benefit from them. So they remained dormant. But now in the post-globalization era women power is rising. That is economical aspect. Historically, men has performed well in all the field like science, philosophy, politics, rulership, spirituality.. Women doesn't stand anywhere. In science Einstein rules, in philosophy Socrates rules, in leadership Gandhi rules, in rulership Alexander rules and in spirituality Jesus/Buddha/Krishna rules. There is no female scientist at par comparable with Einstein. I know some people don't like to compare. But beware, compare is the basis of your qualification. No, I am not criticizing feminism. I am just saying what I have observed. I might be talking totally nonsense. There are only two possibility for this. Either they cant do big creation or they don't want to do big creation. I think latter is true. They don't want to do big creation. They don't want to make better painting then Michael Angelo. Can they make better paintings than Michael Angelo. Yes they can. But they don't want to. Sometimes, it happens. You can do a thing but you don't want to do that for some reason. And the reason I found is, women's greatest creation is the ability to give birth which no male can do. Creating something live is most difficult thing. Which even thousands of Michael Angelo cannot do that. No matter how good his painting is. But the painting is dead. There is not life in those paintings. But woman's creation has life in it. Which has power to give birth to Michael Angelo. Therefore, woman are definitely the greatest creator. And I think that's the reason they don't want to create any thing non-living. So, women's biggest asset is to become a mother. A women is considered to be incomplete unless she become a mother. But the modern girls don't want to be mother so soon. They are more career oriented. In today's world career has become most important. Earlier people do not used to worry more about career. They were happy.

Nature doesn't give everything in free. If nature make man more powerful, then females are in general more resistive. They have strong survival instinct. Given an identical situation females will survive comparatively longer. That's the reason 4-5 years age gap are kept at the time of marriage. Husbands are older.

In India, women have been particularly more unfortunate. After Gargi's incident they had been deprived from main streamline of knowledge - Vedas. That made their condition even more worse. They became as a congregator of man's earning and remained mostly as men's physical commodity. They had no strong power in the family affairs. But the situation has improved a bit now.

Feel free to agree/disagree... :)